Follow Dan Kreuter on LinkedIn
Twenty years ago, a billion-dollar RIA was a rare thing. Founders who crossed that threshold had built something genuinely unusual. Today there are over one thousand of them, and the founders who spent a decade building to a billion are now staring at competitors with ten, twenty, fifty times that in assets. To boot, these mega-RIAs often have dedicated departments for tax, estate, and trust, institutional-grade technology, and marketing budgets they could not match if they tried.
Scale has reset the competitive baseline. Reaching $1B AUM is still a laudable accomplishment, but as for the competitive landscape, you’re not the big player $1B used to represent.
Here’s a number to put it into proportion: Cerulli just published that roughly 300 RIAs (representing $5B AUM and up) oversee about 54% of assets. That means the other 98% of the industry only operates on 46% of the assets. I would also tell you–this trend has accelerated. Consolidation is happening.
Ultimately, this has ramifications for what the next 10 years of the industry will look like, particularly in terms of service models and value propositions. Today, I’m sharing my thoughts on what is to come in the RIA’s competition for growth.
If you want an honest read on where your firm stands in today’s market, that is exactly the kind of conversation Gladstone was built for. Request a confidential valuation conversation at https://gstoneinc.com/contact-us/
The Dry Cleaner Problem
Every city and town has two things in abundance: dry cleaners and registered investment advisors. If what your firm does is focused on asset allocation and you are not helping your clients with anything beyond that, your ultimate value may be that of a dry cleaner with a Series 65 license.
It is blunt, and it is accurate. The wealth management firms that are pulling ahead are not just better investors. They are building around what we call the nine pillars of holistic advice, which include:
- Retirement planning
- Benefits planning
- Health and wellness (longevity + care)
- Estate and trust
- Tax strategy
- Business services
- Family office functions.
Several of those pillars have nothing to do with how you run investing. They are about how deeply embedded you are in a client’s financial life and how difficult you are to replace.
The aggregators that have grown to $100 billion or more have largely already figured this out. They have bought CPA firms. They have built estate planning departments. They have hired tax strategists. The firm that is still competing on portfolio returns alone is competing on a dimension that is rapidly becoming the commodity layer of this business.
$10B Is the New $1B Of The Past
The scale threshold that used to confer competitive advantage has moved. A billion dollars of AUM was once unusual enough to matter on its own. It signaled resources, stability, and the ability to invest in the business in ways smaller firms could not. Now there are so many billion-dollar firms that scale at that level no longer differentiates.
What scale actually buys is a moat. It buys strategic advantages like:
- Better pricing on technology and custody
- The ability to weather downturns without cutting into the business
- The capacity to add holistic services that smaller firms typically cannot afford to staff
- Typically, a higher multiple when you eventually go to market, because buyers know that scale operators are more defensible businesses
The implication for founders who are not yet at scale is not that they have failed. It is that the market is moving faster than most people realize, and the decision about what to do with the next three to five years matters more than it did a decade ago. What got you here might not get you there.
Not All Buyers Are The Same
There is an assumption among founders who are exploring a sale that the buyer landscape is more or less uniform, and that the differences come down to culture and price. After 20 years at Gladstone and 22 RIA transactions in the last 9 quarters, I can tell you that is not how it works.
We track more than 60 legitimate buyers in a proprietary database, and the spectrum is significant. Some buyers have been doing this for 15 years and have absorbed 50 or more firms. They have integration teams, transition playbooks, and a track record of what works and what does not.
Others are $2 billion firms with minority backing and inorganic growth fever who have never actually closed a deal and are figuring it out in real time at your expense.
The current seller’s market has created a version of this problem where there is a buyer for almost everyone. That sounds like good news, but the reality is that it has allowed buyers who are not actually ready to compete for deals they should not be winning. A founder who sells to the wrong buyer at a great multiple and then watches the integration fall apart has made a very expensive mistake.
The firms that are winning acquisitions right now share specific characteristics:
- Access to immediate capital
- A dedicated transition team
- A track record of retaining the advisor talent and client relationships that came with the deals they have already done.
- Proven organic growth (marketing) machines
We know who meets (or doesn’t meet) these criteria, no matter what picture they paint you in the pitch.
What This Means for the $2B Buyer
There is a version of this conversation that applies to founders who are thinking about buying rather than selling. The minority investor community has convinced a lot of $2 billion firms that inorganic growth is the path forward. Some of them are right. The ones with the right talent, a dedicated corporate development function, and the capital infrastructure to close and integrate deals may have a path here.
The majority do not. They will do an acquisition here or there, spend the next two or three years managing the integration instead of running their business, and eventually conclude that it was not worth it. In a seller’s market, you are competing against firms that have done 50 of these. The process advantages they have built over a decade are not easily replicated. It’s not just the valuation problem.
For most $2 billion firms, the smarter investment is in talent, platform, and marketing. Grow the business you have. Make it harder to want to leave and easier to join. Build the kind of brand that generates inbound conversations rather than requiring you to initiate every one. That is the path that creates durable enterprise value, and it is far less likely to blow up in year two.
Brand Is Not Optional
The fee-only, fiduciary, non-proprietary-product positioning that distinguished independent advisors for years has been neutralized. Every wirehouse has adopted the language. The moral high ground that once separated RIAs from the brokerage world is no longer a differentiator. It is an expectation.
What differentiates a firm now is whether anyone outside its existing client base has heard of it. Brand drives inbound. Inbound converts at a meaningfully higher rate than outbound. When you go to market, buyers look at whether your firm has the kind of identity and presence that will sustain growth after the transaction closes.
The firms that have done this well are not all household names. Creative Planning has invested heavily in social media and digital presence. Fisher Investments has built a national brand through consistent advertising and a recognizable point of view. LPL just signed a multi-year partnership with the PGA. These are not coincidences. They are strategic bets on the premise that the firms that will win the next decade are the ones that are well-known, not just well-run.
The same is true at the $500 million and $1 billion level. You do not need a Super Bowl ad. You need to show up clearly and specifically enough that when someone searches for what you do, they find something that tells them why your firm and not the dozens of others that sound exactly like it.
We have been inside 22 RIA transactions over the last 9 quarters, tracked every meaningful buyer in this market for two decades, and watched the firms that positioned themselves well walk away with outcomes that surprised even them.
The firms that waited too long, or went to market without understanding what buyers were actually evaluating, left a lot on the table.
If you want to know where your firm stands before a buyer tells you, that is the conversation Gladstone was built to have. It is confidential, it costs you nothing, and it will give you a clearer picture of your business than most founders ever get. Start at https://gstoneinc.com/contact-us/
Dan Kreuter is the Founder and CEO of Gladstone Group, a boutique investment bank and executive search firm serving the wealth and investment management industry. He has advised on RIA and wealth management transactions for over 40 years. Reach him at contact@gstonellc.com.