The Economics of Internal Succession Don’t Work the Way Most Founders Think

By Michael D. Bilotta, President, Gladstone Group

Follow Michael on LinkedIn

For most RIA owners, two things matter above everything else when they start thinking seriously about the future of their firm. The first is straightforward: they want full value for what they built. Decades of work, client relationships developed over years, a business that runs well and grows. 

The second is harder to quantify but no less important. They want their team to land well. They spent years developing their culture and standard of care, and the way their people work together. A transition that dismantles those hard-fought gains is not a success, regardless of what the check says. If anything, the right outcome is one that gives both the team and the clients access to something better than what the founder could build alone.

Those two priorities are not in conflict. In a well-structured transaction with the right partner, they are complementary. Here is a look at what our conversations sound like with founders who are looking to achieve both.

Economics of Internal Succession

Before a founder picks up the phone, they have usually worked through some version of the following internal options:

  • Next-gen buyout. The team wants it, the founder wants it. At current valuations, the math rarely works without significant outside financing that most next-gen advisors are not positioned to take on
  • Gradual equity transfer. Selling small tranches over time at a discount preserves continuity but rarely captures full value and tends to create prolonged uncertainty for the team
  • Minority recapitalization. Bringing in outside capital to fund the next generation’s purchase solves the capital problem but introduces a new stakeholder with their own timeline and return expectations
  • ESOP. Increasingly discussed, rarely the right fit for a service business where the value lives in client relationships rather than hard assets

Many of these get explored. Each one tends to run into a capital constraint, a valuation gap, or complexity the founder did not anticipate when they first sketched the plan.

Where You Are Now

Gladstone works with many founders who arrive with an internal transition already underway, at least conceptually. The next generation knows they are a key part of the plan. There have been signals, maybe even direct conversations. What has not happened is a serious discussion about what the firm is actually worth and what it would take for that next generation to fund the purchase.

In 2026, a well-run, growing RIA is trading at multiples that would have seemed unreachable a decade ago. The advisors a founder wants to hand the firm to may be deeply committed to its future. Commitment does not solve a capital problem. Even at a meaningful discount to market value, the economics of an internal buyout are difficult for most next-generation advisors to execute, particularly for firms that have grown into the $1 Billion+ aum range.

When that conversation finally happens in concrete terms, it is almost always a surprise. The next generation may be serious about succession planning, but are they willing to take on the debt to fund it? That is typically the moment a founder picks up the phone and calls us.

Prioritizing Your People During Transition

The founders who resist exploring outside options often do so for the right reasons. They do not want to disrupt their team or their clients handed to strangers. They do not want the culture they spent decades building to get absorbed into something unrecognizable. Those are legitimate concerns. 

They are also concerns that a thoughtful transaction process is specifically designed to address. The client-advisor relationship is the asset in any RIA acquisition. Any buyer who understands this business knows that disrupting it is a death knell for the transaction. The things that made the firm worth acquiring are exactly the things a serious acquirer works to protect.

What changes is the operational weight the founder has been carrying alone. Compliance, technology, HR, the back-office infrastructure that consumes time and energy better spent with clients. The founders who come out of transactions most satisfied are rarely the ones who were just chasing a number (although the numbers are meaningful). They are the ones who found a platform that could do more for their clients than they could do on their own, and structured a deal that protected what they had built.

The Cost of Waiting

So, if it sounds so simple, why don’t you hear more of these stories? We would argue from experience that while most RIA aggregators  can put together a good pitch, fewer can run an excellent platform. The key here is that seller due diligence is the factor that separates a great transition from a disappointing one. Rushed transitions are much less likely to be good ones. 

Also, the best time to have these discussions with potential acquirers depends on momentum. A firm in strong growth, with a visible trajectory and an intact team, is a fundamentally different negotiating position than a firm where the founder is running out of energy and the future is less clear. Buyers (and lenders) know the difference. 

The founders who explore their options early, before any particular pressure exists, are the ones who get to set the terms of the conversation. They have time to meet multiple parties, to understand what different platforms actually look like in practice, and to make a decision that reflects what they want rather than what circumstances dictate. Trust takes time to build in this business. 

Gladstone has spent 20 years representing sellers in this market. The founders who come to us early, when they are still running hard and have real options in front of them, consistently reach better outcomes than the ones who come to us when the decision has already been made for them. If you are thinking about the future of your firm, about how to protect what you built and get full value for it, that conversation is worth having now. Contact Gladstone to start it.

Michael D. Bilotta is the President of Gladstone Associates, Gladstone Group’s M&A advisory practice. He has advised on RIA and wealth management transactions for nearly 20 years. Reach him at mbilotta@gstonellc.com.